Salt is actually good for you, in spite of Mainstream Medical advice.
But the anti-caking agents used in most salt, not so much.
This story begins with my visit to our local grocery store that, to their credit, is trying their hardest to offer more “healthy” option to shoppers. I have been looking for some time to find a lunchmeat that won’t give me a migraine or cancer. I had glanced at their offerings before, but mostly saw just the name brands that I already knew would not work for me.
But, on this trip, I walked up and asked a person at the counter “Do you have any items that do not have Nitrites, Nitrates, or Cultured Celery products in them?” Of course, he didn’t know but called a more experienced person over to help me. And she said, “Yes, we do! We have beef from our own butcher department that we cook and add only salt and pepper to.” I questioned her further and she insisted it contained ONLY salt and pepper. I have to tell you, I was ecstatic! I bought just a quarter pound to try it.
Imagine my disappointment when I got home to find the attached label on the sliced beef.
Now, I don’t blame the person that waited on me. She, like most people, just have no idea how much our food supply has been compromised with chemicals. She most likely didn’t even know that Yellow prussiate of soda (sodium ferrocyanide decahydrate) was on the ingredient list. Even if she did, most people have become conditioned to passing right over wording like “an anticaking agent” as if telling us what its purpose is somehow excuses it from being questioned as an ingredient.
In fact, companies have made many ingredients innocuous like this example:
“Additives. Morton Sea Salt contains no additives. Morton TFC Sea Salt is prepared by treating Sea Salt with a minute concentration of yellow prussiate of soda, an additive permitted for food use, as a water-soluble anti-caking agent.”
https://www.mortonsalt.com/business-product/morton-sea-salt/
And our FDA allows them to make these claims.
So is Yellow prussiate of soda (sodium ferrocyanide decahydrate) bad for us? The FDA says no. I say possibly.
I have a general common-sense rule: If a company feels it is necessary to hide an ingredient by not actually listing it on the label, or, if they do list it, they add an explanatory phrase that implies its just “necessary”, then it’s probably not good for you. Did you notice that they used the common name “Yellow prussiate of soda” on the label, and not the chemical name “sodium ferrocyanide decahydrate”?
Wouldn’t want anyone to notice that ugly word “cyanide” now, would we?
Does Cyanide sound familiar to you at all? As in The Jonestown Massacre?
The FDA says it’s fine, so it’s OK, right?
Except that there IS a toxic level that can be ingested. Ask the people at Jonestown. And in gas form, it will kill you pretty quickly. All the sources agree on that. Many studies will tell you there is an “Acceptable” level, but NONE of them will say it is NOT toxic. It’s mentioned almost as a disclaimer.
They also mostly use rats or mice to determine the toxicity levels (how much you can tolerate without it killing you), and as I like to say:
Rats ≠ Humans. Also:
Mice ≠ Humans. And:
Rabbits or any other organisms ≠ Humans.
Not even every HUMAN = every other Human! But at least the comparison is more valid comparing humans to humans.
Bottom line: because there is no claim that I could find that Yellow prussiate of soda (sodium ferrocyanide decahydrate) is NON-Toxic, then it CAN be toxic. Here’s a few lines of descriptions that often get used INSTEAD of non-toxic: “Despite the presence of the cyanide ligands, sodium ferrocyanide has low toxicity (acceptable daily intake 0–0.025 mg/kg body weight” and “less toxic than many salts of cyanide, because they tend not to release free cyanide”. (Bold and highlights added by me). They just can’t bring themselves to say “Non-Toxic”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_ferrocyanide
Here’s another thing. Even if we consume only the small amount daily that they have determined is not TOXIC, we can also get cyanide from other dietary sources.
For starters, cyanocobalamin. You know, the synthetic form of Vitamin B12. If you take a multivitamin, it most certainly contains this form of B12 because it’s the cheapest. And yes, when your body processes it, it does leave some cyanide in your body, at least for a while. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanocobalamin
Or how about Cassava. People are eating a lot more of this to avoid gluten.
But did you know it’s also the primary ingredient in Tapioca Pudding? Wikipedia has a pretty honest accounting of Cassava, including its cyanide content (and other non-food uses that might interest you). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassava
And here’s even a few more foods that have cyanide:
· almonds
· millet sprouts
· lima beans
· soy
· spinach
· bamboo shoots
· Various seeds and pits that generally aren’t eaten on purpose but can be accidentally ingested, like peach and cherry pits.
https://eatdrinkbetter.com/articles/cyanide/
Finally, if you look at the FDA and USDA, they only focus on Toxicity: if eating it will kill you. Quickly. Otherwise, it’s not just their problem.
It may not be their problem, but it most certainly still can be yours.
What the FDA and USDA fail to recognize is that there is another kind of poisoning: Insidious. Even if you don’t ingest a fatal dose in one meal, if you are continually ingesting small amounts over a long period of time, it can make you ill, and still eventually kill you in a slow, painful death. This can occur in several types of diseases, i.e Vitamin B12 Deficiency, and Hyperparathyroidism. They can make your life miserable for a long time before they kill you.
Well, this was a lot of writing for a single ingredient, wasn’t it?
Welcome to my world.
And Bon Appetite!
And please follow me for more news you wish you didn’t know!
I feel it all adds up, yet it is so hard to proof.
Fluoride, Spike, Cyanides, TiO2-nano, Hg, Al, “traces of cow milk casein” both in vaccines and later in food that cause immediate allergy first, then via food “waning” IG4 anti-anti-bodies to casein that “by chance” snugly fit to the folate receptor (see vinu’s newsletter SubSt, causing 75% of autism), the War against Biomes, nano plastic in drinking water from oxidative disinfectants gnawing away HDPE and protective polyphenols (yes, plastic pipes get produced with protective antioxidants poured into the resin to extrude pipes, and toxicity of both HDPE and polyphenols’ degradation zoo (all variations are possible) is quite unknown), and so much I do not know.
We need to turn over every stone.
And do it very precise.
I just read toxicity re-evaluation „nothing to see here“ : https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/5374
NOAEL of 1g/kg body weight.
Huh?
How did they find out?
Perhaps we find out it is true and valid.
Why are bitter almonds and apricot kernels (0.1-4mg/g cyanides) not allowed then? If you can swallow oxidative stress troublemakers all day long like candy?
(In a proper protocol, you will compensate by antioxidatives and re-fill glutathione of cells by C and NAC and anti-cancer stuff, not to help prestage cancer by NAC, in a per patient timing!)
2 measures here. Apricot kernels could HEAL. Loosing customers.
IF you read it, you have to find what they do NOT mention, just like in MSM.
My interest would be if any „adulteration“ that of course just by chance come with it add to lowering functionality of amygdala or reduce it’s elasticity, or harming reproductive organs and could rise toxicity of each singular ingredient ?
We have to be detectives here, constantly watching out what perverted minds have bred out to battle all citizens of earth alike.
Could there be nonlinear enhancement effects or even built-up of much more toxic substances if given together with Fluoride and eg used fir frying a sausage where you could find sodium nitride?
Toxicology KNOWS you in no way predict what is happening when pouring 3 drugs ore more into a patient.
Toxicology KNOWS people react differently, not only by weight and be dine, but even per kg sensitivity varies about 2-3 orders of magnitude.
Thus effective dose, tolerable level without side effects, and deadly dose vary wildly by say a factor of 1000 for a large number of people.
I call this negligence of insights that get ignored in supermarjed, vitamin industry, and big pharma outright murder and want it stopped.
We can only do by first excluding higher sensitivity to a singukar drug, then measure reaction to a test dose of combinations usually used.
Whose physician would be willing to do dose finding on eg emergency drugs in good times, starting with some skin or mucosal rub tests tomexclude allergies?
THIS would be a start into a new era of loving care for each other, and money should be given for keeping or re-establishing health, not for the things used or cases ir whatever.
And transparency must be re-established against structural corruption by hidden and open interventions.